[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"learn-\u002Flearn\u002Fhow-to\u002Ftreaty-boundaries-on-dls-grid":3,"learn-related-how-to\u002Ftreaty-boundaries-on-dls-grid":225},{"id":4,"title":5,"body":6,"category":204,"createdAt":204,"cta":205,"description":207,"extension":208,"icon":204,"industry":209,"keywords":210,"meta":216,"navigation":217,"path":218,"province":204,"relatedPages":204,"section":219,"seo":220,"stem":221,"systems":222,"updatedAt":204,"__hash__":224},"learn\u002Flearn\u002Fhow-to\u002Ftreaty-boundaries-on-dls-grid.md","Treaty Boundaries on the DLS Grid: Treaties 4, 6, 7, 8, 10",{"type":7,"value":8,"toc":195},"minimark",[9,14,18,53,56,61,64,70,89,93,96,103,111,116,127,130,134,137,140,144,152,163,166,170],[10,11,13],"h1",{"id":12},"treaty-boundaries-on-the-dls-grid","Treaty Boundaries on the DLS Grid",[15,16,17],"p",{},"Five Canadian Numbered Treaties cover most of the Prairie agricultural belt and adjacent industrial corridors:",[19,20,21,29,35,41,47],"ul",{},[22,23,24,28],"li",{},[25,26,27],"strong",{},"Treaty 4"," (1874) — southern Saskatchewan + parts of southwestern Manitoba and southeastern Alberta",[22,30,31,34],{},[25,32,33],{},"Treaty 6"," (1876) — central Alberta, central Saskatchewan, edges of Manitoba",[22,36,37,40],{},[25,38,39],{},"Treaty 7"," (1877) — southern Alberta (Calgary, Lethbridge, Medicine Hat)",[22,42,43,46],{},[25,44,45],{},"Treaty 8"," (1899) — northern Alberta, northeastern BC, southern NWT, part of northern Saskatchewan",[22,48,49,52],{},[25,50,51],{},"Treaty 10"," (1906) — northeastern Saskatchewan plus part of Manitoba",[15,54,55],{},"Township Canada renders all five as polygons at zoom 0 (so the boundaries are visible at the continental scale where most consultation planning happens) on the same map as wells, pipelines, and parcels.",[57,58,60],"h2",{"id":59},"how-the-layer-surfaces-in-the-product","How the layer surfaces in the product",[15,62,63],{},"Two ways:",[15,65,66,69],{},[25,67,68],{},"As a togglable map layer."," Energy Bundle subscribers (Business + $100 add-on) can turn the treaty boundaries on or off in the data catalog. Polygons are coloured per treaty with labels for each treaty name.",[15,71,72,75,76,84,85],{},[25,73,74],{},"As a flag on the parcel report."," Every parcel report at ",[77,78,80],"a",{"href":79},"\u002Fparcel\u002FNE-14-32-21-W3",[81,82,83],"code",{},"\u002Fparcel\u002F[lld]"," checks the parcel centroid against the treaty boundaries layer. If the parcel sits within a treaty area, the \"Indigenous consultation hazard\" card surfaces the treaty name(s) and a reminder copy: ",[86,87,88],"em",{},"Reference only — verify duty-to-consult directly with the affected Nation before any activity.",[57,90,92],{"id":91},"what-this-layer-represents-and-what-it-doesnt","What this layer represents and what it doesn't",[15,94,95],{},"The treaty boundaries layer reflects the polygons published by Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada (CIRNAC) via the Government of Canada's ArcGIS REST service. Five polygons total, covering an area roughly the size of Western Europe.",[15,97,98,99,102],{},"What this layer ",[25,100,101],{},"is",":",[19,104,105,108],{},[22,106,107],{},"An indicator of which Numbered Treaty applies to a given location",[22,109,110],{},"A useful first-pass flag during early-stage project siting",[15,112,98,113,102],{},[25,114,115],{},"is not",[19,117,118,121,124],{},[22,119,120],{},"A consultation list. The duty to consult arises from constitutional jurisprudence; the layer doesn't tell you which Nation to contact.",[22,122,123],{},"A substitute for direct outreach. Treaty geography is one input among many — modern treaty areas, reserve lands, traditional territory claims, and active consultation negotiations all overlap and the treaty polygons don't capture that.",[22,125,126],{},"Legal advice. Cleaning up your project siting against the treaty map doesn't discharge the duty to consult.",[15,128,129],{},"The catalog UI and the parcel report copy reflect this — the language is intentionally \"consultation reference\" rather than \"consultation cleared.\"",[57,131,133],{"id":132},"why-consultation-hazard-on-a-parcel-report","Why \"consultation hazard\" on a parcel report",[15,135,136],{},"For an operator scoping an Alberta CCS injection site, an Alberta wellsite for a proposed reactivation, or a renewable energy project on Prairie farmland, knowing the treaty geography is a Day-One planning input. Drop a candidate parcel into the report, see the treaty flag, route to the appropriate consultation team before further siting work.",[15,138,139],{},"The flag is intentionally surfaced for everyone (not gated behind the Energy Bundle) because the treaty geography itself is public information published by the federal government. The full Energy Bundle treaty overlay is the map view; the parcel-level flag is the free first-touch.",[57,141,143],{"id":142},"whats-coming","What's coming",[15,145,146,147,151],{},"A broader Indigenous consultation overlay is spec'd in ",[77,148,150],{"href":149},"\u002Fdocs\u002Fdata-layers\u002Findigenous-consultation","docs\u002Fdata-layers\u002Findigenous-consultation.md",". It would add:",[19,153,154,157,160],{},[22,155,156],{},"Reserve and modern settlement lands (CIRNAC)",[22,158,159],{},"Provincial consultation databases (AB Aboriginal Consultation Office, BC Consultative Areas Database)",[22,161,162],{},"Disclaimer copy reviewed with Indigenous Relations and legal",[15,164,165],{},"That layer is pending source selection and legal sign-off on disclaimer copy. Until it ships, the Treaty Boundaries layer is what's available.",[57,167,169],{"id":168},"related","Related",[19,171,172,178,183,189],{},[22,173,174],{},[77,175,177],{"href":176},"\u002Fdocs\u002Fdata-layers\u002Falberta-ccs","CCS Pore Space Tenure layer reference",[22,179,180],{},[77,181,182],{"href":149},"Indigenous Consultation Overlay spec",[22,184,185],{},[77,186,188],{"href":187},"\u002Ffor\u002Fccs-developers","Township Canada for CCS Developers",[22,190,191],{},[77,192,194],{"href":193},"\u002Fblog\u002Faer-ccs-pore-space-tenure-quarter-sections","AER CCS Pore Space Tenure — Quarter Section Identification",{"title":196,"searchDepth":197,"depth":197,"links":198},"",2,[199,200,201,202,203],{"id":59,"depth":197,"text":60},{"id":91,"depth":197,"text":92},{"id":132,"depth":197,"text":133},{"id":142,"depth":197,"text":143},{"id":168,"depth":197,"text":169},null,{"label":206,"href":187},"Read the CCS developer guide","Township Canada renders Canadian Numbered Treaty boundaries as map polygons and surfaces them as a flag on every parcel report. What the layer does and doesn't mean.","md","oil-and-gas",[211,212,213,214,215],"treaty boundary map canada","canadian numbered treaties dls","treaty 6 boundary alberta","treaty 7 alberta map","indigenous consultation overlay",{},true,"\u002Flearn\u002Fhow-to\u002Ftreaty-boundaries-on-dls-grid","how-to",{"title":5,"description":207},"learn\u002Fhow-to\u002Ftreaty-boundaries-on-dls-grid",[223],"DLS","QS9bZiT8mnW-KEObPwOWFn_TAwclPUzgaI5oOERbbpo",[226,423,668],{"id":227,"title":228,"body":229,"category":204,"createdAt":204,"cta":407,"description":409,"extension":208,"icon":204,"industry":410,"keywords":411,"meta":417,"navigation":217,"path":418,"province":204,"relatedPages":204,"section":219,"seo":419,"stem":420,"systems":421,"updatedAt":204,"__hash__":422},"learn\u002Flearn\u002Fhow-to\u002Faafc-crop-history-quarter-section.md","AAFC Crop History: Look Up 5 Years of What's Been Grown on Any Quarter Section",{"type":7,"value":230,"toc":400},[231,235,238,242,249,275,278,282,288,294,305,311,315,318,340,344,363,371,373],[10,232,234],{"id":233},"aafc-crop-history-per-quarter-section","AAFC Crop History per Quarter Section",[15,236,237],{},"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) publishes a national raster called the Annual Crop Inventory (ACI). Each ~30m pixel carries an integer crop class — canola, spring wheat, soybean, fallow, etc. — for each growing season from 2009 onward. Township Canada aggregates the most recent five years to a per-cell summary and surfaces it on every parcel report.",[57,239,241],{"id":240},"what-the-summary-returns","What the summary returns",[15,243,244,245,248],{},"For any quarter section in Alberta or Saskatchewan, the AAFC crop summary card on ",[81,246,247],{},"\u002Fparcel\u002F\u003Clld>"," returns:",[19,250,251,257,263,269],{},[22,252,253,256],{},[25,254,255],{},"Dominant crop"," — the crop class that occupies the most acres across the 5-year window",[22,258,259,262],{},[25,260,261],{},"Rotation"," — the year-by-year sequence of dominant crops (e.g., Canola → Wheat → Canola → Lentil → Canola)",[22,264,265,268],{},[25,266,267],{},"Shannon diversity index"," — a 0-1 measure of how varied the rotation is (0 = monoculture, ~1 = even mix of several crops)",[22,270,271,274],{},[25,272,273],{},"Years covered"," — which years are included in the aggregate",[15,276,277],{},"The pipeline reprojects each year's raster, takes the modal crop class per 1km vector cell, and joins to AAFC's published colour table. Coverage extends across Alberta and Saskatchewan; the layer can be toggled as a full map overlay at the Ag Farmer tier and above.",[57,279,281],{"id":280},"how-to-use-it","How to use it",[15,283,284,287],{},[25,285,286],{},"For farmers checking a new lease."," Before signing, pull the report on the parcel. If the dominant crop is wheat-monoculture for five straight years, that's relevant — both for understanding what came off and for nitrogen\u002Fdisease pressure planning. If the rotation is canola-wheat-canola-wheat, that's a different signal.",[15,289,290,293],{},[25,291,292],{},"For agronomists prepping visits."," A territory of 20 parcels with dominant crop and diversity already in the report lets the agronomist build the visit list around what's actually growing — soybean visits in one cluster, canola in another.",[15,295,296,299,300,304],{},[25,297,298],{},"For carbon project developers."," The Alberta TIER Conservation Cropping protocol requires historical crop history per parcel. The per-parcel AAFC summary serves this directly without a manual GIS query against AAFC's published rasters. See ",[77,301,303],{"href":302},"\u002Flearn\u002Fhow-to\u002Fcarbon-credits-legal-land-descriptions","Alberta carbon credits legal land descriptions",".",[15,306,307,310],{},[25,308,309],{},"For investors underwriting a portfolio."," Dominant crop and diversity across 60 candidate parcels give a quick read on intensification level — high-canola, low-diversity portfolios behave differently than mixed grain-pulse-oilseed portfolios in price-shock years.",[57,312,314],{"id":313},"whats-not-in-the-summary","What's not in the summary",[15,316,317],{},"A few clarifications:",[19,319,320,327,333],{},[22,321,322,323,326],{},"It's ",[25,324,325],{},"modal per pixel, then aggregated"," — a quarter section that grew canola on 60% and wheat on 40% reports canola as dominant, not \"60% canola \u002F 40% wheat.\" The parcel-level acreage breakdown is in the underlying data; the surfaced summary picks a single dominant.",[22,328,322,329,332],{},[25,330,331],{},"observed, not declared."," AAFC ACI is satellite-derived; what gets reported is what the imagery sees. A canola crop that failed in May and got reseeded to oats may show as oats; an unseeded fallow shows as fallow.",[22,334,335,336,339],{},"The rotation is ",[25,337,338],{},"chronological",", not most-recent-first. Year 5 (oldest) → Year 1 (newest).",[57,341,343],{"id":342},"coverage","Coverage",[19,345,346,352,357],{},[22,347,348,351],{},[25,349,350],{},"Alberta:"," full coverage",[22,353,354,351],{},[25,355,356],{},"Saskatchewan:",[22,358,359,362],{},[25,360,361],{},"Manitoba, BC, Ontario:"," partial; AAFC publishes for the agricultural land base only",[15,364,365,366,370],{},"See the ",[77,367,369],{"href":368},"\u002Fdocs\u002Fdata-layers\u002Faafc-crop-inventory","AAFC layer reference"," for the data pipeline.",[57,372,169],{"id":168},[19,374,375,381,389,394],{},[22,376,377],{},[77,378,380],{"href":379},"\u002Flearn\u002Fhow-to\u002Flsrs-soil-productivity-score","LSRS Soil Productivity Score",[22,382,383],{},[77,384,386,387],{"href":385},"\u002Fparcel\u002FSE-14-29-21-W2","Parcel report at ",[81,388,83],{},[22,390,391],{},[77,392,393],{"href":302},"Alberta Carbon Credits Legal Land Descriptions",[22,395,396],{},[77,397,399],{"href":398},"\u002Fblog\u002Fsaskatchewan-quarter-section-guide-grain-farmers-scic-filers","Saskatchewan Quarter Section Guide for Grain Farmers",{"title":196,"searchDepth":197,"depth":197,"links":401},[402,403,404,405,406],{"id":240,"depth":197,"text":241},{"id":280,"depth":197,"text":281},{"id":313,"depth":197,"text":314},{"id":342,"depth":197,"text":343},{"id":168,"depth":197,"text":169},{"label":408,"href":385},"Pull a parcel report","AAFC's Annual Crop Inventory shows dominant crop per pixel since 2009. Township Canada aggregates it to a 5-year rolling per-quarter summary with rotation and diversity score.","agriculture",[412,413,414,415,416],"aafc crop history","crop history quarter section","what was grown on this parcel","aafc annual crop inventory","5 year crop rotation lookup",{},"\u002Flearn\u002Fhow-to\u002Faafc-crop-history-quarter-section",{"title":228,"description":409},"learn\u002Fhow-to\u002Faafc-crop-history-quarter-section",[223],"LEUX2tZFsJoDRyPH08HITsQ9QWBP7Y5_dJDRUHljFLE",{"id":424,"title":425,"body":426,"category":204,"createdAt":204,"cta":653,"description":655,"extension":208,"icon":204,"industry":209,"keywords":656,"meta":661,"navigation":217,"path":662,"province":663,"relatedPages":204,"section":219,"seo":664,"stem":665,"systems":666,"updatedAt":204,"__hash__":667},"learn\u002Flearn\u002Fhow-to\u002Faer-facilities-eight-categories.md","AER Facilities Map: 8 Categories from 40+ Petrinex Sub-codes",{"type":7,"value":427,"toc":645},[428,432,435,439,550,557,561,564,567,571,577,583,589,595,599,602,604,617,619],[10,429,431],{"id":430},"aer-facilities-map-8-customer-facing-categories","AER Facilities Map — 8 Customer-Facing Categories",[15,433,434],{},"The AER's ST102 facilities dataset lists every licensed midstream and processing facility in Alberta — batteries, gas plants, compressor stations, disposal wells, custom treaters, terminals, water source wells. The raw dataset uses 40+ Petrinex sub-codes for fine-grained facility typing. Township Canada collapses these into eight customer-facing buckets so the data catalog UI stays readable and the icons mean something visually.",[57,436,438],{"id":437},"the-eight-categories","The eight categories",[440,441,442,458],"table",{},[443,444,445],"thead",{},[446,447,448,452,455],"tr",{},[449,450,451],"th",{},"Category",[449,453,454],{},"Petrinex sub-codes covered",[449,456,457],{},"What it represents",[459,460,461,473,484,495,506,517,528,539],"tbody",{},[446,462,463,467,470],{},[464,465,466],"td",{},"Battery",[464,468,469],{},"Multi-well, single-well, group, oil sands batteries",[464,471,472],{},"Crude\u002Fmultiphase production facility — typically the first downstream point from wells",[446,474,475,478,481],{},[464,476,477],{},"Gas plant",[464,479,480],{},"Gas processing, sweet, sour, dehydration",[464,482,483],{},"Gas treatment \u002F processing",[446,485,486,489,492],{},[464,487,488],{},"Compressor",[464,490,491],{},"Compressor station, booster, gathering compressor",[464,493,494],{},"Pressure-boosting along the gas transport path",[446,496,497,500,503],{},[464,498,499],{},"Disposal",[464,501,502],{},"Acid gas disposal, water disposal, salt cavern, deep well",[464,504,505],{},"Sub-surface disposal of produced water, acid gas, etc.",[446,507,508,511,514],{},[464,509,510],{},"Custom treating",[464,512,513],{},"Custom-treating facility",[464,515,516],{},"Third-party processing for non-operator volumes",[446,518,519,522,525],{},[464,520,521],{},"Terminal",[464,523,524],{},"Pipeline terminal, truck terminal, rail terminal",[464,526,527],{},"Crude\u002Fcondensate transfer and storage",[446,529,530,533,536],{},[464,531,532],{},"Water source",[464,534,535],{},"Water source wells, fresh water facilities",[464,537,538],{},"Source of water for industrial use (frac, injection)",[446,540,541,544,547],{},[464,542,543],{},"Other",[464,545,546],{},"Anything not in the above (typically rare or unusual facility types)",[464,548,549],{},"Catch-all",[15,551,552,553,556],{},"The category mapping lives in ",[81,554,555],{},"app.categorize_facility()"," on the database. Updates land alongside AER ST102 publication cycles.",[57,558,560],{"id":559},"how-the-map-renders","How the map renders",[15,562,563],{},"Each category gets a distinct icon style on the map, sized to be readable at zoom 8 (province scale) without overcrowding. Labels use the facility name; clicking a facility opens a popover with the licensee, status, full Petrinex sub-code, and DLS legal description.",[15,565,566],{},"The layer is part of the Energy Bundle data catalog. Toggle it on alongside AER Wells and AER Pipelines for the full midstream view.",[57,568,570],{"id":569},"use-cases","Use cases",[15,572,573,576],{},[25,574,575],{},"Operators evaluating new tie-in options"," — Batteries and compressors near a proposed wellsite are the candidate destinations for new pipeline. The 8-category breakdown lets you filter to just the relevant facility types in a single click.",[15,578,579,582],{},[25,580,581],{},"Custom treaters and water source operators identifying coverage gaps"," — toggling just the Custom Treating or Water Source categories surfaces the geographic distribution; useful for siting new capacity.",[15,584,585,588],{},[25,586,587],{},"Acid gas disposal planning"," — the Disposal category surfaces existing acid gas disposal wells; new injection projects need to evaluate proximity to existing infrastructure for risk assessment.",[15,590,591,594],{},[25,592,593],{},"Closure obligation analysts"," — facilities follow a similar lifecycle to wells (active, suspended, abandoned, reclamation-certified). The lifecycle filter applies here too.",[57,596,598],{"id":597},"why-the-categorization-is-worth-the-work","Why the categorization is worth the work",[15,600,601],{},"A raw dump of all 40+ Petrinex sub-codes produces an unreadable map — the icon set has too many similar-looking types and customers spend time figuring out what each one means rather than acting on the data. The 8-bucket model maps to how operators actually think about midstream infrastructure: where does the production go (battery), how does it get processed (gas plant, custom treating), how is it moved (compressor, terminal), and what's the disposal pattern (disposal).",[57,603,343],{"id":342},[19,605,606,611],{},[22,607,608,610],{},[25,609,350],{}," full AER ST102 coverage",[22,612,613,616],{},[25,614,615],{},"Saskatchewan, BC:"," not yet — see roadmap",[57,618,169],{"id":168},[19,620,621,627,633,639],{},[22,622,623],{},[77,624,626],{"href":625},"\u002Flearn\u002Fhow-to\u002Faer-wells-lifecycle-status","AER Wells Lifecycle Status",[22,628,629],{},[77,630,632],{"href":631},"\u002Flearn\u002Fhow-to\u002Faer-pipelines-map","AER Pipelines Map",[22,634,635],{},[77,636,638],{"href":637},"\u002Ffor\u002Foil-and-gas","Township Canada for Oil and Gas Operators",[22,640,641],{},[77,642,644],{"href":643},"\u002Fuse-cases\u002Fenergy","Energy use case overview",{"title":196,"searchDepth":197,"depth":197,"links":646},[647,648,649,650,651,652],{"id":437,"depth":197,"text":438},{"id":559,"depth":197,"text":560},{"id":569,"depth":197,"text":570},{"id":597,"depth":197,"text":598},{"id":342,"depth":197,"text":343},{"id":168,"depth":197,"text":169},{"label":654,"href":637},"See the Energy Bundle","Township Canada collapses AER ST102 facility sub-codes into 8 clean categories (battery, gas plant, compressor, disposal, etc.) so the catalog UI stays readable across the full Alberta dataset.",[657,658,659,660],"aer facilities map alberta","aer st102 facilities","battery gas plant compressor map","alberta oil gas facility types",{},"\u002Flearn\u002Fhow-to\u002Faer-facilities-eight-categories","alberta",{"title":425,"description":655},"learn\u002Fhow-to\u002Faer-facilities-eight-categories",[223],"gussaU14ivYFnAcyL1Q1HksoKdSgOKBc-i7XY_L9B_c",{"id":669,"title":670,"body":671,"category":204,"createdAt":204,"cta":826,"description":827,"extension":208,"icon":204,"industry":209,"keywords":828,"meta":833,"navigation":217,"path":631,"province":663,"relatedPages":204,"section":219,"seo":834,"stem":835,"systems":836,"updatedAt":204,"__hash__":837},"learn\u002Flearn\u002Fhow-to\u002Faer-pipelines-map.md","AER Pipelines Map: Visualize Alberta Oil and Gas Pipelines on the DLS Grid",{"type":7,"value":672,"toc":819},[673,676,679,683,707,714,718,724,730,736,742,748,752,755,775,777,788,795,797],[10,674,632],{"id":675},"aer-pipelines-map",[15,677,678],{},"Alberta has roughly half a million kilometres of licensed pipeline distributed across natural gas, crude oil, multiphase, water disposal, fuel gas, and CO2 service. Every segment is licensed by the Alberta Energy Regulator and tracked by start\u002Fend DLS legal land descriptions. Township Canada renders the full network as a line layer on the same map as wells, facilities, and parcels.",[57,680,682],{"id":681},"what-the-layer-shows","What the layer shows",[19,684,685,691,701],{},[22,686,687,690],{},[25,688,689],{},"Line geometry"," for every AER-licensed pipeline segment",[22,692,693,696,697,700],{},[25,694,695],{},"Mid-point label points"," computed via ",[81,698,699],{},"ST_LineInterpolatePoint"," — drops the label at the centre of each segment so the line layer stays readable at low zoom",[22,702,703,706],{},[25,704,705],{},"Stack ordering"," with the line beneath label points so the geometry stays visible when labels are toggled",[15,708,709,710,713],{},"The PMTiles for the pipeline layer use ",[81,711,712],{},"--coalesce-densest-as-needed"," to keep southern-Alberta tile sizes manageable. In central-southwest Alberta where the density is highest (5000+ segments per township in a few areas), the PMTiles pipeline collapses adjacent segments at low zoom so the visual stays legible.",[57,715,717],{"id":716},"use-cases-by-role","Use cases by role",[15,719,720,723],{},[25,721,722],{},"Operators planning new gathering infrastructure"," — toggle the pipelines layer to see existing tie-in candidates near a proposed wellsite. Cross-reference with the AER Facilities layer (battery, gas plant, compressor, etc.) to identify the actual destination points.",[15,725,726,729],{},[25,727,728],{},"Integrity teams"," — for a planned ILI (in-line inspection) campaign, the layer shows the segments to schedule against. The mid-point labels make it straightforward to identify named lines from the map view.",[15,731,732,735],{},[25,733,734],{},"Right-of-way planning"," — for a new pipeline corridor, the existing network lets the engineering team identify parallel-routing opportunities (sharing existing ROW corridors saves environmental assessment time) and proximity conflicts.",[15,737,738,741],{},[25,739,740],{},"M&A diligence"," — when evaluating an acquisition target's infrastructure footprint, the pipelines layer plus the AER Wells layer plus the BA licensee snapshot API give a full picture without round-tripping the AER directives portal.",[15,743,744,747],{},[25,745,746],{},"Surface-rights holders"," — when a pipeline crosses your land, knowing the licensee and the line ID is the first step to engaging on integrity, leak history, or right-of-way maintenance.",[57,749,751],{"id":750},"combining-with-other-layers","Combining with other layers",[15,753,754],{},"The pipelines layer is most useful in combination:",[19,756,757,763,769],{},[22,758,759,762],{},[25,760,761],{},"+ Wells layer"," — shows which wells are tied into which lines; especially relevant for shut-in or suspended wells where the gathering infrastructure remains",[22,764,765,768],{},[25,766,767],{},"+ Facilities layer"," — shows the destination batteries, gas plants, and compressors that the lines connect to",[22,770,771,774],{},[25,772,773],{},"+ Crown dispositions overlay (planned)"," — shows the surface dispositions (PIL, LOC) that license the right-of-way",[57,776,343],{"id":342},[19,778,779,784],{},[22,780,781,783],{},[25,782,350],{}," full AER coverage",[22,785,786,616],{},[25,787,615],{},[15,789,790,791,794],{},"The pipeline layer ships as part of the Energy Bundle. See the ",[77,792,793],{"href":643},"Energy use case page"," for the full layer set.",[57,796,169],{"id":168},[19,798,799,803,809,813],{},[22,800,801],{},[77,802,626],{"href":625},[22,804,805],{},[77,806,808],{"href":807},"\u002Fdocs\u002Fdata-layers\u002Faer-wells","Wells data layer reference",[22,810,811],{},[77,812,638],{"href":637},[22,814,815],{},[77,816,818],{"href":817},"\u002Fblog\u002Fdls-tools-alberta-well-closure","DLS Tools for Alberta Well Closure",{"title":196,"searchDepth":197,"depth":197,"links":820},[821,822,823,824,825],{"id":681,"depth":197,"text":682},{"id":716,"depth":197,"text":717},{"id":750,"depth":197,"text":751},{"id":342,"depth":197,"text":343},{"id":168,"depth":197,"text":169},{"label":654,"href":637},"Township Canada renders every AER-licensed pipeline as a line layer with mid-point labels. For operators, integrity teams, and right-of-way planning.",[829,830,831,832],"aer pipelines map alberta","alberta pipeline gis layer","oil gas pipelines dls","pipeline integrity mapping",{},{"title":670,"description":827},"learn\u002Fhow-to\u002Faer-pipelines-map",[223],"pgR71Mu7_uVsfeZ2ASo-sjORRtvs9bKuegw3ZuVHeR0"]